There is no room for discrimination within places of worship: Madras HC

According to CHENNAI: The Madras High Court has, god does not discriminate and the courts have held that there is no room for discrimination in temples.

CrimeNews Info Wire2 min read
Madras HC refuses to set aside conviction of ex-minister, kin in assets case

According to CHENNAI: The Madras High Court has, god does not discriminate and the courts have held that there is no room for discrimination in temples.

Article outline

  1. What happened
  2. What comes next
  3. The details
  4. The bottom line

Citing Chapter 9 Verse 29 of Bhagavad Gita, a division bench of justices G Jayachandran and E Manoharan remarked, "In the eyes of God, all living beings are equal and God does not discriminate." It additionally observed that the courts have additionally held that there is no room for discrimination in a place of worship.

In practice, the observations were created while disposing of a public interest litigation petition filed by Madhavan Ramanuja Dasan, a resident of Kancheepuram and secretary of Thirukatchi Nambi Thirumalaidar Seva Sangam. He stated that he is a Thenkalai Vaishnavite and there is discrimination against non-Brahmins in worshipping at the Sannadhi of Manavala Munigal in the Varadaraja Swami temple.

He alleged that non-Brahmins are denied entry to the shrine through the main entrance and are created to stand outside the Sannadhi where they are given prasadham and theertham but satari is not placed on them.

Notably, the bench recorded the submissions created by the executive officer, executive trustee and special administration pleader that the counter-affidavit of the trustees can be taken as an undertaking they will ensure no discrimination is created in the distribution of theertham, prasadam and satari.

"Suffice it to say this would resolve one of the grievances of the petitioner especially insofar as it relates to the distribution of theertham, prasam and satari, " the bench remarked in the recent order.

Referring to the recital of the hymns and prabandham, the bench remarked the counter-affidavit of the executive trustee is taken on record to the effect that apart from Adhyapaka Mirasi. It is a secured right and conferred on the Thenkalai sect and an notable service offered during certain rituals, the petitioner nor any other person or group "will not be prevented from reciting prabandham in any shrines of the temple".

In short, there is no room for discrimination within places of worship: Madras HC is the central thread here, and readers can expect follow-up reporting as the picture becomes clearer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *