‘Grand dialogue’

Editorial Published August 24, 2026 Updated August 24, 2026 07: 55am.

PoliticsNews Info Wire3 min read
Work in progress

Editorial Published August 24, 2026 Updated August 24, 2026 07: 55am.

Article outline

  1. What happened
  2. Official response
  3. The details
  4. The bottom line

Key points

  • While speaking at the Balochistan National Workshop in Islamabad lately, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif called on a "grand, frank and meaningful dialogue" to address the province's problems.
  • For example, the PPP administration had in 2009 rolled out the Aghaz-I-Huqooq-I-Balochistan package.
  • THE country's top civil and military leaders are absolutely right when they say that dialogue and development are needed to address Balochistan's crises.
  • But perhaps one should recall that plenty of earlier attempts by the state to bring peace to the province were stalled or remain unimplemented.

Editorial Published August 24, 2026 Updated August 24, 2026 07: 55am. Join our Whatsapp Channel. Add Dawn as a trusted source.

But perhaps one should recall that plenty of earlier attempts by the state to bring peace to the province were stalled or remain unimplemented. As well as new agreements, so as to truly stabilise Balochistan and bring lasting peace to this troubled province, a credible political process must commence, with the state guaranteeing that it will fully implement previous promises.

While speaking at the Balochistan National Workshop in Islamabad lately, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif called on a "grand, frank and meaningful dialogue" to address the province's problems. He continued that the province's residents had first right over its resources. In a similar vein the chief of defence forces stressed the need for empowering Balochistan's youth.

It is certainly welcome that the rulers see the need to tackle Balochistan's political challenges through dialogue. While kinetic measures are needed to accord with immediate terrorist threats, the underlying factors fuelling discontent can only be handled through a political process. The state must keep in mind previous attempts to address the province's challenges.

For example, the PPP administration had in 2009 rolled out the Aghaz-I-Huqooq-I-Balochistan package. Despite the passage of 17 years, plenty of of the package's key points remain unimplemented. For example, it had proposed releasing political workers, except those involved in heinous crimes. Nevertheless, over the past few months, we have seen peaceful activists rounded up and thrown in jail. Similarly, the 2009 package had sought to address the province's socioeconomic woes; suffice it to say, social indicators in Balochistan remain miserable. The PML-N had introduced a package of its own in 2015. Much of that scheme additionally remains unfulfilled. CPEC was similarly supposed to transform the province's fortunes. It has not.

Instead of reinventing the wheel, the state must implement what it had promised in these packages. Plenty of of these schemes' salient points reflect the demands of the province's nationalist politicians. As well as peaceful activists, while a verifiable and transparent mechanism needs to be worked out to support implement previous and new promises, therefore, to implement these promises in full, a grand dialogue should bring on board the province's genuine political leadership.

In practice, the past few months have seen a sharp spike in terrorist activity in Balochistan. The only sustainable way of addressing the insurgency is to supplement kinetic actions with a genuine political process that can, in the long-term, eliminate the underlying factors that are fuelling discontent. Published in Dawn, August 24th, 2026.

Taken together, the developments around 'Grand dialogue' point to a situation that is still moving, and the coming days should bring more clarity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *