Expert Explains | How floods triggered Nepal’s demand for compensation
Expert Explains How floods triggered Nepal's demand for compensation Nepal's foreign minister remarked that the country has written to the UN's fund for responding to loss and damage.
Expert Explains How floods triggered Nepal's demand for compensation Nepal's foreign minister remarked that the country has written to the UN's fund for responding to loss and damage.
Article outline
- What happened
- The key numbers
- Why it matters
- Background
- The bottom line
Key points
- 4 min read New Delhi Sep 9, 2026 06: 36 AM IST.
- After Khanal's remarks, Nepal's Prime Minister, Balen Shah, rapidly thanked India and China for their assistance in the aftermath of the floods.
- Around $822 million has been pledged to the UN's loss and damage fund, but around $350 million is allotted for disbursement.
- Nepal has suffered a catastrophic flash flood, with more than 1, 000 dead, thousands still missing almost 10 days afterwards, and whole villages, bridges and roads swept away.
- The US is the leading contributor, at 25%, to the key cause of climate change, CO2 accumulated in the atmosphere.
In practice, a drone view of the aftermath of flash flooding along the Trishuli river amidst fresh water surge warning in the Trishuli Bazaar area of Nuwakot district, Nepal, on August 30, 2026. Photo: AP.
Nepal has suffered a catastrophic flash flood, with more than 1, 000 dead, thousands still missing almost 10 days afterwards, and whole villages, bridges and roads swept away. The impact appears to have been heightened as the Himalayas now stand much impacted by heavy infrastructure development by the Chinese in Tibet. And then there is climate change.
Notably, the Himalayas are referred to as the third pole given their massive reservoirs of ice and water. For years, melting of their glaciers has been noticed, with climatologists warning of severe consequences.
In practice, the US is the leading contributor, at 25%, to the key cause of climate change, CO2 accumulated in the atmosphere. Europe is next at around 20% with the Chinese now fast catching up at15% of the global stock. India's contribution, by contrast is under 4%. Moreover, India's per-capita CO2 emissions at around 2 tonnes per year are half of the global average of 4.5 tonnes.
After the floods, Nepal, whose own emissions are particularly little, stated it is bearing the consequences of a difficulty it did not create.
Nepal's foreign minister, Shishir Khanal, remarked the country has written to the UN's fund for responding to loss and damage. This fund was set up in 2022 to support countries respond to economic hits from extreme events, along with financing mitigation and adaptation. Contributions to it are voluntary.
According to Khanal had earlier, the Himalayan country had decided to shift its diplomatic position to claim 'compensation' for natural disasters instead of aid.
"Nepal's greenhouse gas emissions are virtually negligible. Yet, we are paying the ultimate cost for a global crisis we did not create. The rapid melting of glaciers and these catastrophic mountain tsunamis are direct consequences of global climate change. This is not a matter of charity; it is a matter of legal and moral liability, " Khanal had remarked.
He had additionally named India. "The major industrial emitters – such as China, which is the world's top emitter, the United States at number two, and India at number three – have a historical responsibility to compensate vulnerable nations like Nepal, " he had remarked in an interview with The Kathmandu Post.
'Needles in haystacks': An expert explains the challenge of early warnings in the Himalayas.
After Khanal's remarks, Nepal's Prime Minister, Balen Shah, rapidly thanked India and China for their assistance in the aftermath of the floods. Khanal additionally walked back, afterwards saying the matter was not concerning "shifting the blame to one or the other country" but regarding "working together".
For context, the enormity of the rehabilitation task makes it imperative for Nepal to access international funding. An approach of eschewing 'aid', the go-to of previous times, and instead seeking international solidarity fits in with the new Nepal with a young and globally aware administration.
As the largest emitters, seemed obvious inclusions in the compensation demand, but why India?, the US and China. To plenty of, this appeared to follow the usual Nepali quest of balancing its two neighbours, India and China – although the clever minds of European NGOs, busy for long in Nepal, cannot be dismissed placing such hints. Europe, an emitter of much bigger consequence than India, was not mentioned in these reports. Status of the loss and damage fund.
For context, the UAE has provided $100 million. Much of the other contribution has come from Europe.
Meanwhile, the US, which had pledged around $17 million, has now pulled out of this funding mechanism, with climate change itself being referred to as a 'hoax' by President Donald Trump. The author was ambassador of India to Nepal.
Taken together, the developments around expert Explains How floods triggered Nepal's demand for compensation point to a situation that is still moving, and the coming days should bring more clarity.




