Islamabad High Court Asked to Act Over Stray Dog Culling Ban Violations

Notably, a contempt petition has been filed in the Islamabad High Court (IHC) over the alleged failure of administration authorities to comply with the court's landmark order banning the indiscriminate killing of stray dogs in Islamabad.

Key points

• The respondents included the CDA, Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad, ICT Administration, Livestock Department, Islamabad Wildlife Management Board and Environmental Protection Agency.
• Advocate Altamush Saeed, Founding Managing Partner of Environmental and Animal Rights Consultants Pakistan and an animal law expert, is arguing the contempt petition.
• The petition was filed on September 4, 2026, in the case of Nelofar v.
• Add ProPakistani to Preferred Sources and see more of our stories in Google Search and Top Stories.
• They were directed to submit compliance reports to the IHC's Deputy Registrar (Judicial) within 60 days.

For context, the petition was filed on September 4, 2026, in the case of Nelofar v. Chief Commissioner, ICT (W.P. No. 2165 of 2025). Meanwhile, the IHC has admitted the petition and issued notices to the respondents, seeking their replies.

Advocate Altamush Saeed, Founding Managing Partner of Environmental and Animal Rights Consultants Pakistan and an animal law expert, is arguing the contempt petition. He additionally represented petitioner Nelofar in the original constitutional petition that led to the court's April 28, 2026 judgment. Punjab Builds Pakistan's First Wildlife Hospital. Court Banned Indiscriminate Culling.

In its April 28 judgment, the IHC prohibited the poisoning, shooting, and indiscriminate killing of stray dogs in Islamabad.

In practice, the court ruled that euthanasia could only take place when a qualified veterinarian provides written certification that an animal is rabid, incurably diseased or dangerously aggressive.

Notably, the judgment instead directed authorities to implement a comprehensive Trap, Neuter, Vaccinate and Release (TNVR) programme throughout residential, commercial and public areas.

Authorities were additionally ordered to maintain detailed records of dogs that are captured, vaccinated, sterilised, rehomed or euthanised. The records must include veterinary documentation as well as dates and locations. Stray Dog Crackdown Sparks Outrage Among Animal Rights Activists. Dead Dogs Cited During Original Case.

For context, the original proceedings included allegations regarding the treatment of stray dogs by administration authorities.

Photographic evidence presented to the court by Saeed allegedly indicated dead dogs inside a vehicle attributed to the Capital Development Authority (CDA).

In practice, the petition had alleged arbitrary killing, improper capture and relocation of stray dogs, in violation of the ICT Stray Dog Population Control Policy notified on December 28, 2020.

In practice, the court additionally examined claims concerning TNVR operations, including an alleged expenditure of around Rs.19, 000 per dog. It discovered a lack of supporting documentation, an audit trail, and verifiable data, according to the case material. Court Ordered Broader Population Management.

Meanwhile, the April judgment went beyond banning indiscriminate killing and directed authorities to establish a broader system for managing the stray dog population.

Authorities were ordered to conduct an area-wise scientific survey of Islamabad's stray dogs and maintain transparent records of population-control activities.

For context, the court additionally directed the creation of systems for rescuing, sheltering and adopting animals. Animal welfare organisations and NGOs were to be actively involved in implementation.

Meanwhile, the judgment additionally contemplated a multi-stakeholder advisory committee involving veterinarians, zoonotic disease experts, animal welfare organisations, environmental authorities and civil society. The approach reflects the One Health model. It considers animal, human and environmental health together.

Notably, the court further pressed a 24-hour complaint mechanism through which citizens could report aggressive or rabid animals. It additionally directed that anti-rabies vaccines be produced available through public health facilities. Authorities Given 60 Days.

Notably, the respondents included the CDA, Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad, ICT Administration, Livestock Department, Islamabad Wildlife Management Board and Environmental Protection Agency.

In practice, the new contempt petition alleges that the authorities have not implemented the April judgment in its true letter and spirit.

With the petition now admitted and notices issued, the respondents will have to explain to the High Court whether and how they complied with the directions.

In practice, the proceedings will now test whether the court's ruling on stray dog management has been implemented through actual administration measures.

Saeed remarked the judgment established that indiscriminate culling is illegal and that stray dog population management must be humane, scientific and transparent. He remarked the purpose of the contempt proceedings is to ensure that the judgment is implemented rather than simply acknowledged. Stay Connected with ProPakistani. Obtain the latest news and stories wherever you prefer. Follow on Google Discover.

Add as a preferredSource on Google Follow on Google News Join WhatsApp.

In short, islamabad High Court Asked to Act Over Stray Dog Culling Ban Violations is the central thread here, and readers can expect follow-up reporting as the picture becomes clearer.