Despite many statutory protections, there is no clear constitutional right to clean water
Despite plenty of statutory protections.
Despite plenty of statutory protections.
Article outline
- What happened
- Why it matters
- Official response
- What comes next
- The key numbers
- The bottom line
Key points
- More to the point, Congress amended the CWA in 1977, 1981, and 1987 to strengthen both the financing and the enforcement of water pollution regulation.
- But during the Nixon Administration, Congress took another stab at the matter by adopting the Clean Water Act of 1972.
- The Mississippi Legislature passed the Mississippi Safe Drinking Water Act of 1997.
- Supreme Court to rule on 2020 Census results that negatively impacted Mississippians.
- General Atomics confirmed second expansion this year, bringing 125 more jobs to Shannon.
Despite plenty of statutory protections, there is no clear constitutional right to clean water. By: Sid Salter – September 16, 2026.
Jarring as it was for Jackson residents, the appellate court ruling seems to track with both history and the law.
For the record, in a case involving Mississippi's capital city of Jackson, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled earlier this month that there exists no constitutional right to clean water.
For context, the ruling came in Sterling v. City of Jackson, in which the plaintiffs alleged that Jackson city authorities knowingly exposed residents to lead-contaminated drinking water and misrepresented the water's safety for consumption. Safe and available water has been an matter in Jackson for a number of years due to a plethora of challenges, including aging and deteriorating infrastructure, the instability of Yazoo Clay soil, uncollected water fees and operational matters at the city's water treatment plants.
Meanwhile, the court held that the Constitution does not provide express protections against municipal water contamination or require municipal authorities to provide truthful information during a public health crisis, arguing that "the Constitution does not provide redress for every government wrongdoing."
But during the Nixon Administration, Congress took another stab at the matter by adopting the Clean Water Act of 1972. (Followed by the Safe Drinking Water Act, the nation's primary law regulating drinking water.) Those statutes created the first federal framework for regulating water pollution. The act additionally created and funded a nationwide wastewater treatment infrastructure.
More to the point, Congress amended the CWA in 1977, 1981, and 1987 to strengthen both the financing and the enforcement of water pollution regulation. Although Congress has provided statutory protections for well over half a century and the Supreme Court has heard plenty of cases over alleged violations of those statutes, the Supreme Court has not recognized any explicit environmental rights provision in the Constitution.
Since of that, a number of states have adopted constitutional provisions and statutes that go far beyond federal environmental protections. Consequently, some state courts have been tougher on polluters than federal courts.
For the plaintiffs in this case, it's significant to note that like the U.S. Constitution, the Mississippi Constitution additionally doesn't have an explicit constitutional provision undergirding a claim of a state constitutional right to clean water. Massachusetts, New York and Pennsylvania are states where their state constitutions provide clean water rights.
In practice, the Mississippi Legislature passed the Mississippi Safe Drinking Water Act of 1997. It contains this language: "An adequate supply of safe, pure drinking water is essential to the public health and welfare."
Mississippi law, at least statutes adopted by the Mississippi Legislature, seems to suggest that the path to claim clean, safe water (at the state level) is through statutory entitlement, regulatory enforcement, and going to state court over state statutes and regulations.
But constitutional law, whether at the federal or state level, doesn't seem to carry much weight in that pursuit. Solutions to Jackson's broader infrastructure challenges still hinge on the cogent assessment of three-term former Jackson Mayor Harvey Johnson Jr. Johnson, the city's first Black chief executive, led Jackson to spend or obligate almost $200 million on water and sewer projects between 1997 and 2013 in a bid to forestall the current Jackson water crisis.
Years ago, Johnson wrote regarding his perceptions of why there's an infrastructure crisis in the city: "The historic disparity in the provision of municipal services to local residents; A decreasing population and dwindling tax base; An increasing rate of poverty among the water system user base; and Adverse intergovernmental policies that placed the burden of financing improvements on local government and ratepayers."
State authorities point to the current Jackson city government's lax efforts to collect water bills and note that other Mississippi cities backing and maintain their water systems through local fee systems and bonds.
For now, Jackson's leaders have little choice but to absorb the 5th Circuit's ruling and move forward. Regarding the Author(s).
Sid Salter is a syndicated columnist. He is Vice President for Strategic Communications at Mississippi State University. Sid is a member of the Mississippi Press Association's Hall of Fame. His syndicated columns have been published in Mississippi and a number of national newspapers since 1978. Opinion Sid Salter September 9, 2026. Adam Telle's appointment makes Mississippi's robust defense influence even stronger.
Mississippi is not simply participating in the national defense conversation. For the moment, it is helping write the agenda. More From This Author. Opinion Sid Salter September 2, 2026. For over 40 years, Mississippi workers have exceeded expectations at Raytheon. Opinion Sid Salter August 26, 2026.
Supreme Court to rule on 2020 Census results that negatively impacted Mississippians. Opinion Sid Salter August 19, 2026.
Shades of Skynet? State's measured approach to AI policy development was wise plan. Opinion Russ Latino September 15, 2026. Sydney Sweeney Novig Ad: Body positivity's double standard. Opinion Lesley Davis September 8, 2026. The socialist takeover isn't so quiet anymore.
In practice, the socialists were patient for a decade. As the DSA put it in its July newsletter "Our gains are hitting the Democratic Party establishment like a leftist tidal wave, and our members are gearing up for much bigger plans toward 2028." Opinion Roger Wicker September 8, 2026. U.S. Must remain vigilant.
U.S. Senator Roger Wicker reflects on 9/11, saying Americans still carry the shock and grief of that day, and a grateful nation honors those who responded to the atrocities. News Magnolia Tribune September 16, 2026. Magnolia Mornings: September 16, 2026. News Jeremy Pittari September 15, 2026.
Seven human trafficking victims discovered in Southaven as part of AG's participation in nationwide operation. News Frank Corder September 15, 2026. Few contested judicial races for Mississippi voters to decide in November. Business Frank Corder September 15, 2026. Hitachi Energy brings largest U.S. Investment to date to Mississippi. Business Frank Corder September 10, 2026.
General Atomics confirmed second expansion this year, bringing 125 more jobs to Shannon. Business Frank Corder September 10, 2026.
C Spire expanding fiber network with new high-capacity corridor between Jackson and Olive Branch. Culture Alistair Begg September 16, 2026. I want to see. Culture Parrish Alford September 15, 2026. While trying to ignore, victory would be the Rebels' best response. Culture Meredith Biesinger September 15, 2026. All Aboard: Discovering Casey Jones and Water Valley's railroad past. Opinion Merle Flowers September 10, 2026. Mississippi does not have pharmacies to spare. Opinion Grant Callen September 10, 2026. What I'm looking for in Mississippi's next governor. Opinion Delbert Hosemann September 9, 2026.
Senator Cochran was right on timber.
In short, despite many statutory protections, there is no clear constitutional right to clean is the central thread here, and readers can expect follow-up reporting as the picture becomes clearer.


