4.Data center investors are overlooking the political risks
Data center investors are overlooking the political risks. Add Axios as your preferred source to.
Data center investors are overlooking the political risks. Add Axios as your preferred source to.
Article outline
- What happened
- What comes next
- Official response
- The bottom line
Key points
- State of play: New York has put a temporary moratorium on sizeable new data center projects.
- "There is a time horizon problem, " explains a Wall Street executive active in the sector.
- Won't he have to argue that what's good for Pennsylvanians is additionally good for other Americans?
- Behind the scenes: Data center investors lament the opposition, often framing it as a correctable community education matter.
- Wall Street and Silicon Valley are not the electorate.
Zoom in: The business is booming. Public and private equities are both up and to the right – not only for actual project operators, but additionally for related energy and vendor plays. The politics have turned sharply negative, often on a bipartisan basis.
State of play: New York has put a temporary moratorium on sizeable new data center projects. Pennsylvania and Texas have implemented new regulatory roadblocks that could decline development.
New data center restrictions, including some moratoriums and bans, have been introduced in dozens of other states.
Behind the scenes: Data center investors lament the opposition, often framing it as a correctable community education matter. They additionally believe that much of the political pushback will dissipate after the midterm elections.
Even if hostilities harden, they add, there are plenty of states where new projects can be built or existing ones expanded.
"There is a time horizon problem, " explains a Wall Street executive active in the sector. "Capital is underwriting decades of demand while politics runs to the next election. Those two things at times don't reconcile easily. I wouldn't overweight or underweight any one state." Yes, but: Local fights could obtain nationalized.
For example, imagine that Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro runs for president. Won't he have to argue that what's good for Pennsylvanians is additionally good for other Americans?
Permitting and siting are usually a municipal or state-level problems, but the federal administration does have all sorts of levers that could slow the industry's roll.
Wall Street and Silicon Valley are not the electorate. "We can't let China win the AI race" isn't a salient statement for most normies, particularly when their electricity bills keep rising.
For context, the bottom line: There is more than one way for an AI bubble to burst.
In short, 4.Data center investors are overlooking the political risks is the central thread here, and readers can expect follow-up reporting as the picture becomes clearer.
