Accused Palisades Fire starter pleads not guilty as second trial approaches

See more of our coverage in your search results. Add The California Post on Google.

TechnologyNews Info Wire4 min read
Accused Palisades Fire starter pleads not guilty as second trial approaches

See more of our coverage in your search results. Add The California Post on Google.

Article outline

  1. What happened
  2. The key numbers
  3. Official response
  4. What comes next
  5. The bottom line

Key points

  • The Palisades Fire destroyed thousands of homes in Pacific Palisades and parts of Malibu, killed 12 individuals, and caused $150 billion in damages.
  • "There's a fire, there's a fire, " Rinderknecht could be heard saying in the 911 call.
  • Outside the court house, Rinderknecht's attorney Steve Haney addressed the shift in strategy by the prosecution.
  • Rinderknecht's new trial start date was moved from October 19 to November 2.
  • During Rinderknecht's initial trial in June, prosecutors tried to prove that the the suspect was indeed responsible for both fires.

In practice, the man accused of sparking the devastating Palisades Fire pleaded not guilty Wednesday to reduced federal charges, weeks after the initial case against him concluded in a mistrial.

Jonathan Rinderknecht, 30 – who appeared in court dressed in a beige jumpsuit and sporting a beard with shackles around his waist – stood beside his attorney as he was asked if he understood the charges against him.

"Yes, " the accused arsonist replied, saying he did not need to have the charges read aloud.

While the second count alleges he caused the destruction that followed when the blaze reignited and became the deadly Palisades Fire, the first count against Rinderknecht accuses him of starting the Lachman Fire on New Year's Day 2025.

After prosecutors confirmed the move last week, a third count of setting timber on fire was dropped.

"What are they going to do? They can't go in and have the same trial after such an overwhelming statement from the jury, " he remarked of the earlier mistrial.

"They changed their charging so they could change the playing field and have a better chance for conviction for the second trial, but I'm confident they will have the same challenges at the second trial that they had at the first, " he continued.

"I really felt like, 'What are we doing here?' You're supposed to be presenting this case to me to convict that man, and I felt like that doesn't create sense. You're making me feel like he's more and more innocent with each fact, " one juror remarked to journalists after the trial.

That case concluded with the jury deadlocked 10-2 in favor of acquittal.

Jurors were unable to reach a unanimous verdict despite being sent back to deliberate, with the foreman ultimately telling the judge there was nothing the court could do to support them reach an agreement.

"There is no direct evidence that he began a fire on January 1st. That's the challenge. Its all circumstantial, " Haney remarked.

Meanwhile, the government's case at trial centered on cellphone records, surveillance footage and Rinderknecht's behavior after the blaze. Prosecutors remarked he had visited a trail in the area "hundreds of times" and allegedly employed a green Bic lighter afterwards identified in his car. Rinderknecht repeatedly called 911 after the blaze erupted.

"There's a fire, there's a fire, " Rinderknecht could be heard saying in the 911 call. "There's a fire a top of Pacific Palisades Highlands."

Notably, the Palisades Fire destroyed thousands of homes in Pacific Palisades and parts of Malibu, killed 12 individuals, and caused $150 billion in damages.

Haney has repeatedly called his client "a scapegoat, " and plenty of Angelenos have pointed the finger at the fire department and administration authorities over accusations of mismanagement. Mayor Karen Bass was in Ghana when the fire erupted, despite severe wind warnings ahead of the inferno.

Meanwhile, the judge has ruled that attorneys are not allowed to explore the city's response to the blaze.

"I cannot mention the negligence of the LA fire department. It's not allowed. It's not a defense, " Haney stated.

Rinderknecht's new trial start date was moved from October 19 to November 2. He remains in custody and held on no bail.

"Jonathan is still facing substantial prison time. But he's confident, feeling positive, I think he sees a lot of hope regarding what happened at the first trial, " Haney stated.

For now, accused Palisades Fire starter pleads not guilty as second trial approaches remains the part of the story worth watching, and further updates are likely as more details are confirmed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *