China criticises idea it is in 'malicious competition' over AI
China has hit out against what it has called "threat narratives" over AI governance and cautioned against "engaging in confrontation and malicious competition".
China has hit out against what it has called "threat narratives" over AI governance and cautioned against "engaging in confrontation and malicious competition".
Article outline
- What happened
- The key numbers
- Why it matters
- Background
- What comes next
- The bottom line
Key points
- "There are strong signals that Washington and Beijing share an understanding of frontier risks, " Kenton Thibaut, a senior resident China fellow at the Atlantic Council, wrote lately.
- It is additionally probable to be part of the discussions between US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice-Premier He Lifeng.
- But US President Donald Trump has remarked his priority is making sure the US develops the tech faster than China.
- But US President Donald Trump downplayed the risks, saying that he wanted to keep the US's lead over China "because whoever wins AI, wins".
- As Trump prepares to host Xi at the White House next week, the two sides are trying to include AI on the agenda, South China Morning Post reports.
It follows Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's calls for a slowdown in AI development – but in a way that prevents China from pulling ahead in the AI race.
Over the past week, industry insiders at the leading US AI labs have been warning in extremely stark terms regarding the potential threat AI poses, with some saying it could wipe out humanity.
China's foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun remarked to journalists on Monday "narratives of threat, confrontation, and malicious competition serve only to disrupt the process of global AI governance and are not in anyone's interest".
"All parties should work together to advance AI in a manner that is open, inclusive, beneficial to all, and oriented toward the good, " he continued.
His comments highlight the difficulties in getting agreement between the world's two leading AI powers.
Notably, an agreement between the US and China to regulate AI development is "next to impossible", notes Chang Jun Yan, an assistant professor with the military studies programme at Singapore's S Rajaratnam School of International Studies.
"As part of each state's core national security interests, cooperation in taking things slower and more safely in relation to AI, is very, very unlikely."
AI now sits at the heart of the US-China rivalry as the world's two largest economies seek to gain an edge in advanced tech. Despite US export bans on critical chips, Chinese AI innovation has been expanding, driven by open-source technology and Beijing's backing.
Plenty of experts believe the US is still ahead, and Chinese firms are trying to catch up as they struggle to raise the hundreds of billions of dollars that investors are ploughing into American AI.
But Beijing, including Chinese leader Xi Jinping himself, has additionally spoken concerning the risks posed by AI. China must "balance development and security", and introduce and improve relevant laws and ethical guidelines, and strengthen prevention of risks, to "safeguard the interests of the people and national security", state security minister Chen Yixin wrote on Sunday.
He cautioned of the dangers of "hostile forces" such as foreign intelligence using AI and called on international cooperation.
Since its developers would be able to see how their models are deployed outside China, and detect and undertsand vulnerabilities, china has "technical reasons" to work with the US, she argues.
In July, China set up the World AI Cooperation Organisation. It intends to shape global AI governance. And speaking at the Brics summit in India on Sunday, Xi proposed creating a community for open-source AI.
All this comes as calls for AI regulation grow louder in the US, especially after a former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxson remarked last week that "there is a strong chance that we could all die in the immediate future" if the current pace of development continued.
Since then top industry bosses, such as Amodei, have pressed a slowdown and more regulation.
"We need ways to ensure that alignment and safety techniques stay ahead of progress in model capabilities, " Open AI's chief exective Sam Altman wrote on X on Monday. It was echoed by Microsoft boss Satya Nadella who remarked AI development "cannot be controlled by a handful of entities".
For context, the competition is fierce. The former Anthropic employee Coxson informed the BBC that there needed to be "some sort of coordinated slowdown with China, if we're going to avoid a race at an international scale".
It is additionally probable to be part of the discussions between US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice-Premier He Lifeng. This person are trying to meet before next week's summit, the paper remarked. Vice-Premier He runs the agency that oversees the country's economic planning, including AI development.
While collaboration between the US and China is significant, experts say the nstakes are high for both countries.
"If China establishes a durable lead in frontier AI, this will not be viewed in Washington as losing a technology race, " notes Chasen Nevett, managing director at Hong Kong-based firm, Forani Investments.
"It will be viewed as losing part of the strategic infrastructure of the next industrial era." Extra reporting by Osmond Chia.
For now, china criticises idea it is in ' malicious competition' over AI remains the part of the story worth watching, and further updates are likely as more details are confirmed.



