Explain blunder in affidavit on marriage sops: Telangana HC to state

HYDERABAD: The Telangana High Court has expressed displeasure over the state government's incorrect reference to Article 162 of the Constitution in an affidavit filed in a case concerning implementation of the Kalyana Lakshmi and Shaadi Mubarak schemes.

Key points

• The petitioner's advocate alleged that employees and pensioners had six pending dearness allowances and that the Second Pay Revision Commission had not been implemented.
• The Advocate General's office acknowledged the mistake and assured the court that corrective steps would be taken.
• The bench directed the state to furnish case-wise details in 19 pending contempt matters, including reasons for non-payment in each case.
• It observed that even court employees had reportedly gone without salaries for a number of months.
• The matter was adjourned to Monday for further hearing.

In practice, a bench headed by Justice NV Shravan Kumar remarked incorrectly quoting a constitutional provision in an official affidavit could not be treated as a mere clerical error and directed the administration to explain how it occurred. The Advocate General's office acknowledged the mistake and assured the court that corrective steps would be taken.

In practice, the court additionally questioned the government's priorities in clearing pending dues, observing that land-loser farmers, retired employees, serving administration staff and temporary workers were additionally awaiting payments. It observed that even court employees had reportedly gone without salaries for a number of months.

In practice, the bench directed the state to furnish case-wise details in 19 pending contempt matters, including reasons for non-payment in each case. Authorities stated tokens had been issued in three cases and the relevant GO published.

In practice, the petitioner's advocate alleged that employees and pensioners had six pending dearness allowances and that the Second Pay Revision Commission had not been implemented. The court, nevertheless, cautioned against turning the proceedings into a political forum.

For context, the bench additionally directed the Principal Secretary, Finance, to file an affidavit stating whether loans had been raised to continue the Kalyana Lakshmi and Shaadi Mubarak schemes and disclosing the State's total outstanding debt. The matter was adjourned to Monday for further hearing.

In short, explain blunder in affidavit on marriage sops: Telangana HC to state is the central thread here, and readers can expect follow-up reporting as the picture becomes clearer.