IHC sets aside 2022 verdict declaring Pakistan Naval Farms, sailing club in Islamabad illegal

IHC sets aside 2022 verdict declaring Pakistan Naval Farms, sailing club in Islamabad illegal.

Key points

• Malik Asad Published September 2, 2026 Updated September 2, 2026 06: 08pm.
• A division bench comprising Justice Inaam Ameen Minhas and Justice Shahrukh Arjumand allowed the intra-court appeals filed against the single-bench judgment.
• Former naval chief Admiral (retd) Zafar Mahmood Abbasi additionally presented further evidence before the court in backing of the appeals.
• Malik Asad is an Islamabad-based reporter for Dawn with two decades of experience covering legal affairs, judicial developments, and the civil bureaucracy.
• The counsel further relied on Supreme Court precedents, arguing that a court should not decide matters beyond what is necessary to determine a dispute.

Malik Asad Published September 2, 2026 Updated September 2, 2026 06: 08pm. Join our Whatsapp Channel. Add Dawn as a trusted source.

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) division bench on Wednesday set aside a 2022 judgment by then-chief justice Athar Minallah declaring the Pakistan Naval Farms and Pakistan Navy Sailing Club along Rawal Lake illegal.

Meanwhile, the court additionally nullified directions for the demolition of the sailing club and the initiation of misconduct and criminal proceedings against former naval chief Admiral (retd) Zafar Mahmood Abbasi and other officers.

In practice, a division bench comprising Justice Inaam Ameen Minhas and Justice Shahrukh Arjumand allowed the intra-court appeals filed against the single-bench judgment.

Notably, the bench additionally set aside the direction to the Auditor General of Pakistan to assess the alleged loss caused to the national exchequer and recover the amount from the officers held responsible.

As well as the direction to transfer the land in the name of the headquarters office, the court further nullified the order declaring the transfer of Naval Farms to the Pakistan Navy illegal.

In practice, the appeals had been filed by the Ministry of Defence, former naval chief Admiral (retd) Abbasi and other affected parties against the 2022 judgment of the single bench.

During the hearing, Sardar Ahmed Jamal Sukhera, counsel for the federation and the Ministry of Defence, argued that the original petition filed by Zeenat Salim primarily concerned notices issued by Pakistan Naval Farms over alleged violations of building bylaws.

He submitted that in 2020, the Directorate of PN Farms had itself written to the Capital Development Authority (CDA), informing it that under the NOC issued by the CDA, PN Farms was required to comply with building bylaws. While the CDA was additionally informed and requested to take appropriate action, consequently, notices were issued to the concerned residents over alleged violations.

According to the counsel, PN Farms subsequently informed all residents that CDA building bylaws would be implemented at the farms with immediate effect.

Sukhera argued that these developments had taken place in 2020, well before the single-bench judgment was delivered in 2022, and that the principal grievance raised in the petition had therefore already been addressed.

He contended that the subsequent judgment contained findings against the armed forces which, according to him, were baseless and unsupported by the evidence on record.

Meanwhile, the counsel further relied on Supreme Court precedents, arguing that a court should not decide matters beyond what is necessary to determine a dispute.

He additionally challenged the maintainability of the petition after an amendment was allowed to introduce objections regarding the existence of the sailing club. He argued that public-interest litigation could not be maintained where the petitioner had a personal interest in the matter, claiming that the record indicated Zeenat Salim had such an interest.

In another appeal, Sukhera argued that the earlier judgment had been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice, due process and a fair trial.

He submitted that the judgment had adversely affected the vested interests of more than 100 club members, but none of them had been issued notices or impleaded as necessary parties.

According to The counsel further, no notice had been issued to the respondent in the petition filed by Nasir Ali, contending that the judgment was therefore legally unsustainable.

As the affected parties had neither been issued notices nor provided an opportunity of being heard, while necessary parties had additionally not been impleaded, after hearing the arguments and examining the record, the division bench held that the principles of natural justice, due process and a fair trial had been violated.

Consequently, the division bench allowed the intra-court appeals and set aside the findings and directions contained in the single-bench judgment.

Consequently, the declaration of Pakistan Naval Farms and Pakistan Navy Sailing Club as illegal, the order for demolition of the sailing club, proceedings against the former naval chief and other officers, and directions concerning the assessment and recovery of losses to the national exchequer all stand nullified.

While the extra attorney general, assistant attorney general and counsel for the CDA represented the federation and other respondents, ashtar Ausaf, Sardar Ahmed Jamal Sukhera and Abdul Wahid Qureshi appeared on behalf of the appellants.

Malik Asad is an Islamabad-based reporter for Dawn with two decades of experience covering legal affairs, judicial developments, and the civil bureaucracy. He can be discovered on X at @asadrp.

For now, IHC sets aside 2022 verdict declaring Pakistan Naval Farms, sailing club in remains the part of the story worth watching, and further updates are likely as more details are confirmed.