Lahore Gymkhana power-sharing deal stalls as Siddique retains chairmanship

LAHORE - The planned rotation of the La­hore Gymkhana Club chair­manship failed to take place on Wednesday after two members of the rival "Monopoly Break­ers" group allegedly voted in favour of incumbent chairman Salman Siddique, allowing him to retain the…

PoliticsNews Info Wire4 min read
Babar ruled out of first England Test, Salman Agha to lead Pakistan

LAHORE – The planned rotation of the La­hore Gymkhana Club chair­manship failed to take place on Wednesday after two members of the rival "Monopoly Break­ers" group allegedly voted in favour of incumbent chairman Salman Siddique, allowing him to retain the position for.

Article outline

  1. What happened
  2. Official response
  3. Why it matters
  4. Background
  5. The bottom line

Key points

  • Members of the Monopoly Breakers group remarked the arrangement was additionally re­corded in the minutes of the rel­evant session.
  • With Mr Siddique's six-month term ending, the chairmanship was projected to pass to Mr Suk­hera.
  • Giving his account of the pro­ceedings, Mr Siddique remarked he had unveiled at the outset that Wednesday would be his last day as chairman.
  • Now they have backed out, saying it is politics and that the numbers are on our side, Mr Lashari remarked.
  • "Sukhera is like my son, " Mr Siddique remarked, adding that he had called on him to take all mem­bers of his group along.

For context, the development has trig­gered a fresh dispute within the club's 12-member manage­ment committee, with the two factions offering conflicting ac­counts of the circumstances that led to Wednesday's vote and the continuation of Mr Sid­dique as chairman. The club's 2026-27 elections, held in Feb­ruary, resulted in an evenly di­vided management committee, with six members elected from Mr Siddique's traditional group and six from the newly formed Monopoly Breakers group led by Ahmed Nawaz Sukhera. Two killed as torrential rain triggers house collapse in Swabi.

After the 6-6 result, the two sides reportedly reached a power-sharing arrangement under which Mr Siddique would serve as chairman for the first six months and Mr Sukhera would take over for the follow­ing six months. Members of the Monopoly Breakers group remarked the arrangement was additionally re­corded in the minutes of the rel­evant session.

With Mr Siddique's six-month term ending, the chairmanship was projected to pass to Mr Suk­hera. Nevertheless, Wednesday's management committee meet­ing took an unexpected turn. Tax relief notification still awaited after KP Cabinet approval.

Members of the Siddique group remarked two Monopoly Breakers members, Dr Ali Raz­zaq and Dr Jawad Sajid, voted in favour of Mr Siddique, enabling him to retain the chairmanship.

Kamran Lashari, a member of the Monopoly Breakers group, alleged that the Siddique group had agreed to the six-month ro­tation after the February elec­tions and had backed Mr Suk­hera's appointment as chairman for the second half of the term.

"The decision was recorded in the minutes. Now they have backed out, saying it is politics and that the numbers are on our side, " Mr Lashari remarked. KP Agriculture Department opens GIS Lab to modernise crop reporting.

Notably, the session had initially been convened to discuss the dis­bursement of enhanced salaries to club employees. Mr Siddique, nevertheless, stated other matters additionally came under discussion.

Giving his account of the pro­ceedings, Mr Siddique remarked he had unveiled at the outset that Wednesday would be his last day as chairman. Nevertheless, he stated, the discussion subse­quently turned to other problems and a majority of committee members expressed opposition to the policies of the Monopoly Breakers group.

Mr Siddique remarked he had sug­gested that the differences be resolved within the group. Ac­cording to him, Mr Lashari then proposed that the matter be set­tled through a vote. He remarked seven of the 12 committee members vot­ed against the Monopoly Breakers group's position and asked him to continue as chairman. Sept 27 long march date unchanged: PTI.

Mr Siddique remarked he would seek to resolve the dispute am­icably at the next management committee gathering. It he projected to be held on Tuesday or Wednesday.

He additionally stated he had asked Mr Sukhera to resolve differences with members of his own group who did not agree with its pro­posed agenda for change.

He expressed hope that the differences would be resolved at the next session.

For context, the dispute has effectively stalled the proposed rotation of the chairmanship and deep­ened the power struggle that emerged after the Febru­ary elections. The Monopoly Breakers group had challenged the long-standing dominance of the traditional group and se­cured six of the 12 seats on the management committee, with its supporters viewing the re­sult as a mandate for change in the club's administration.

In practice, the latest development has raised questions regarding the sta­tus of the noted six-month power-sharing arrangement and whether the agreed trans­fer of the chairmanship can still take place.

As their backing altered the balance within the evenly divid­ed committee and enabled him to remain chairman, it has additionally placed the votes of the two members who allegedly backed Mr Siddique under scru­tiny.

In short, lahore Gymkhana power-sharing deal stalls as Siddique retains chairmanship is the central thread here, and readers can expect follow-up reporting as the picture becomes clearer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *