No Easy Exit: When Hormuz And Bab el-Mandeb Close Together

No Straightforward Exit: When Hormuz And Bab el-Mandeb Close Together.

WorldNews Info Wire7 min read
No Easy Exit: When Hormuz And Bab el-Mandeb Close Together

No Straightforward Exit: When Hormuz And Bab el-Mandeb Close Together.

Article outline

  1. What happened
  2. The key numbers
  3. Why it matters
  4. Background
  5. The bottom line

Key points

  • The 2021 grounding of the Ever Given in the Suez Canal – one ship, six days – disrupted roughly one-tenth of global seaborne trade.
  • Iran's Last Card: Will The Houthis Draw Saudi Arabia And Pakistan In?
  • Beyond The American Umbrella: A New Strategic Triangle Takes Shape.
  • Climate-Smart Agriculture As Pakistan's New Social Contract With Nature.
  • Two Saudi oil tankers bound for Asia reversed course in mid-July in mid-ocean right before they approached Bab el-Mandeb.

Together these two straits bookend the Arabian Peninsula and underwrite a sizeable share of global commerce.

Two Saudi oil tankers bound for Asia reversed course in mid-July in mid-ocean right before they approached Bab el-Mandeb. Tracking data indicated them turning away from their destinations rather than pressing forward. This was not a routine commercial decision. It was a response to the Houthis closing the narrow Red Sea passageway for vessels coming from Saudi Arabia. It has been almost a month since this incident. Houthis – the powerful rebel group in control of much of Northern Yemen – have targeted port infrastructure in Yemen, introduced missiles at cities near the Yemen border in KSA but they have largely let most other ships pass through unobstructed. This may be since after their blockade in 2023, they received a thrashing and then some from the United States.They are reluctant to invite America's wrath again. There are indications, nevertheless, that Iran is pressuring them to close Bab el-Mandeb once more while it closes Hormuz. If this happens, world trade will be impacted on a scale few have contemplated.

Notably, the World's total trade is $35 trillion annually, of which roughly 80% moves over the high seas. Ships traversing these high seas have to pass through narrow passageways. Some are man-made and called canals. Most of these narrow alleyways are naturally formed and are called straits. In practice, the Middle East has two of these chokepoints on either side of the Arabian peninsula. While Hormuz dominates the headlines, Bab el-Mandeb is equally significant.

Together these two straits bookend the Arabian Peninsula and underwrite a sizeable share of global commerce. In a normal year roughly 20 million barrels of oil and products – regarding a quarter of seaborne oil trade and one-fifth of world consumption – pass daily through Hormuz, with almost a fifth of global LNG after the same route, mostly to Asia. At the opposite end, Bab el-Mandeb handled 9.3 million barrels of oil per day in 2023 (roughly 9-12% of seaborne oil) and 8.7% of all seaborne trade by volume, serving as the southern gateway for the Suez corridor's Asia-Europe container and bulk traffic. Close both at once and the only real alternative is the longer, costlier Cape of Good Hope route, directly hitting the $35 trillion in annual trade that still moves overwhelmingly by sea.

This is more than a temporary disruption. The global economy operates as an extended production chain. Crude that never clears Hormuz never reaches Korean or Japanese refineries. Feedstocks that fail to arrive leave European chemical plants idle. Container traffic forced to avoid the Red Sea must sail around the Cape of Good Hope, adding thousands of miles, up to two weeks of transit time, and sharply higher freight costs. The initial loss at the chokepoint is counted again at every downstream factory and warehouse that depends on timely delivery. Just-in-time manufacturing systems in the United States and Europe, built for efficiency rather than resilience, amplify the shock.

Recent history offers clear warnings. The 2021 grounding of the Ever Given in the Suez Canal – one ship, six days – disrupted roughly one-tenth of global seaborne trade. The Houthi campaign that began in late 2023 cut container traffic through the Bab el-Mandeb by as much as 90 percent, forcing major carriers to reroute around Africa at significant cost. Those episodes involved only one chokepoint. Simultaneous pressure on both Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb removes the primary remaining workarounds for Gulf energy and for a sizeable volume of containerized goods that normally transit the Red Sea.

Alternative routes exist on paper but collapse under volume and cost pressure. Saudi Arabia can load crude at Yanbu on the Red Sea and send it north through the Suez Canal or the SUMED pipeline. This path avoids Hormuz, yet it is poorly suited for Asian markets: a voyage that once took roughly 24 days to South Korea expands to more than 50 days when vessels must ultimately sail around Africa. Particularly Substantial Crude Carriers often exceed Suez draft limits, requiring partial offloading or substitution with smaller ships. Both options raise unit costs and reduce net throughput. Recent drone activity near Egyptian Mediterranean ports further erodes confidence that any Middle Eastern entry or exit point remains reliably secure. The bottleneck is no longer merely logistical; the routes themselves have become contested.

Pakistan's LNG Lifeline And The Fragility Of Hormuz.

Simultaneous pressure on both Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb removes the primary remaining workarounds for Gulf energy and for a sizeable volume of containerized goods that normally transit the Red Sea.

Meanwhile, the distribution of pain is uneven, but the systemic exposure is broad. Gulf commodity exporters face immediate revenue losses. Asian importers – China, India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia, and Pakistan – depend most heavily on the roughly 40 miles of water that constitute these two straits. European and American consumers experience the effects more diffusely but no less certainly: elevated crude rates, higher energy and transportation costs, and supply-side inflation that monetary policy cannot easily offset. Oil cannot be printed, and a shorter route around Africa does not exist. Freight costs embed themselves in final goods rates. Empty shelves follow delayed inputs.

Behind the operational details sits a strategic reality. For four decades, the U.S. Navy underwrote freedom of navigation through these waters as a public good of the postwar order. That guarantee rested on credible forward presence and the assumption that no local actor could sustainably challenge it. Notably, the current conflict has tested that assumption. Iranian asymmetric capabilities and Houthi operations have shown that relatively low-cost systems can impose high costs on global commerce and on the political will of external powers. Escorts, mine clearance, and sustained strikes on coastal batteries are resource-intensive and still leave residual risk that commercial operators cost into insurance and routing decisions.

What replaces the previous arrangement is not yet clear. Regional powers are exploring new security understandings, such as the lately signed Makkah Pact between Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan. China has economic interests but has shown limited appetite for the military entanglement required to guarantee passage. Other states lack the combination of naval capacity, basing access, and political bandwidth. In the interim, the dual closure functions as a stress test of the maritime order itself.

For context, the difficulty is not that escape routes do not exist. It is that they are too narrow, too slow, and too expensive to carry the volume on which the modern economy depends. Geography has reasserted itself. The policy question for the United States and its partners is whether the restoration of reliable transit remains a core interest worth the sustained investment and sacrifices required, or whether managed, high-friction chokepoints will become the new baseline. In practice, the tankers that turned around have already answered the first part of that question. The second remains open.

For context, the Abandoned Lifeline: Human Cost Of The Hormuz Deadlock.

Iran's Last Card: Will The Houthis Draw Saudi Arabia And Pakistan In? Pakistan's Greatest Security Threat Is Its Economy. The Political Economy Of Fiscal Compression: Lessons From Sindh's. Reading The Economy: A Weekly Review Of Economic Journalism And. Pakistan's Empty Stadiums And The Missing Jobs Economy. When Liquidity Becomes A Substitute For Reform: The Political Economy. KASHMIR: The History India & Pakistan Tell Differently Dr Ishtiaq Ahmed. How Khojas, Bohras & Memons Built India's Economy Danish Khan. India's Indus Strategy & War Crime EXPLAINED Dr. Hassan Abbas. Why India Is Furious Over Pakistan's Indus Valley Civilization Claim.

IMF Debt, IPPs, China-Pakistan Corridor Explained Khurram Husain. Beyond The American Umbrella: A New Strategic Triangle Takes Shape. The NAB Amendments Judgment And CJ Isa's Legacy. Mubarak Sani Case: What Has Changed? Can Olympic Records And Javelin Diplomacy Thaw The Ice Between India. Fact-Check: Is Punjab CM Maryam Nawaz Suffering From Throat Cancer? Protecting Those Who Protect Humanity: World Humanitarian Day And. Washington Owes Pakistan More Than A Counter Terrorism Dialogue. Pakistan's Governance Challenges: From Potential To Progress. Pakistan's Missing Link In FDI: Engaging The Private Sector. 14th August Special: Independence Of The Soul.

Every City Cutting Down Its Own Name. Climate-Smart Agriculture As Pakistan's New Social Contract With Nature. Broad Peak's Warning: The UN, UNDP, And The Future Of Glacial.

For now, no Easy Exit: When Hormuz And Bab el remains the part of the story worth watching, and further updates are likely as more details are confirmed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *