Supreme Court agrees to review a Reconstruction-era ban on distilling spirits in private homes
Supreme Court agrees to review a.
Supreme Court agrees to review a.
Article outline
- What happened
- The key numbers
- Official response
- Background
- Reaction
- The bottom line
Key points
- The Supreme Court remarked Monday it'll consider if Congress had the constitutional authority to ban distilling spirits in homes in 1868.
- Plaintiffs challenging the prohibition on home distilling claim the 1868 law is an antiquated relic of Reconstruction-era politics.
- Federal law makes home distilling a crime punishable by a maximum sentence of five years in prison and a $10, 000 fine.
- His team informed one media outlet it was "likely being generated by AI." The 2001 arrest record tells a different story.
- Plaintiffs' attorney Robert Alt remarked they are "thrilled" that the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.
Supreme Court agrees to review a Reconstruction-era ban on distilling spirits in private homes. By: Michael Kunzelman, Associated Press – October 19, 2026.
For context, the Supreme Court is pictured Monday, Oct. 5, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib).
In practice, the Supreme Court remarked Monday it'll consider if Congress had the constitutional authority to ban distilling spirits in homes in 1868. Plaintiffs' attorney Robert Alt notes the Founding Fathers would be "rolling over in their graves" to learn the hobby has "been turned into a federal crime."
WASHINGTON (AP) – The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to consider whether Congress had the constitutional authority to impose a ban on distilling spirits in private homes more than 150 years ago.
Plaintiffs challenging the prohibition on home distilling claim the 1868 law is an antiquated relic of Reconstruction-era politics. They argue that Congress overstepped its taxation powers when it enacted the home distilling ban as part of a tax reform measure designed to curb fraud by commercial distillers.
Administration attorneys counter that Congress properly restricted where spirits can be distilled to prevent producers from evading federal excise taxes. They warn that lifting the ban would violate Supreme Court precedent and erode congressional powers.
Separate challenges to the law divided two federal circuit courts. It issued conflicting decisions in April, only 11 days apart.
Meanwhile, a three-judge panel from the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the federal ban in a case brought by John Ream, a brewpub owner from Newark, Ohio. This person wants to distill whisky at home for his personal consumption.
Notably, a Fifth Circuit panel ruled in favor of different plaintiffs – members of the Texas-based Hobby Distillers Association – and concluded that statutory prohibitions on in-home distilling are outside the scope of Congress' taxing power under the Constitution.
For context, the Supreme Court agreed to review the Fifth Circuit decision. It was the Justice Department's preference.
"Our country's founders would be rolling over in their graves to learn that a pastime in which even George Washington partook, which is as American as apple pie and certainly a lot older, has quite absurdly been turned into a federal crime, " Alt remarked in an official note.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs in both cases argue that Congress could ban a broad array of activities inside private homes – including cooking, gardening and remote work – under the government's interpretation of the 19th century law.
"The importance of this case and the questions it presents could hardly be overstated, " the plaintiffs' lawyers wrote. "It presents fundamental questions of the extent of federal power and the powers reserved to the states and the people."
Justice Department attorneys remarked the government's regulation and taxation on the production of distilled spirits is as old as Congress itself. According to They, congress outlawed home distilling to prevent those producers from evading taxes or administration inspections.
"And because the location restrictions were enacted only after lengthy experience with tax evasion, upholding those restrictions would not open the door to hypothetical laws restricting other conduct lacking that history, " they wrote.
In practice, the administration states Ream asked the Supreme Court to resolve an "additional question" of whether location restrictions on home distilling exceed the scope of Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce. But the administration called on the high court to avoid that question, saying it wasn't part of Ream's case or the government's current arguments in either case. Regarding the Author(s). Michael Kunzelman, Associated Press. News Frank Corder October 16, 2026. Colom's campaign notes mugshot is "fake." Law enforcement states otherwise.
For context, a mugshot of Democrat U.S. Senate candidate Scott Colom is being shared online. His team informed one media outlet it was "likely being generated by AI." The 2001 arrest record tells a different story. More From This Author. News Michael Kunzelman, Associated Press July 21, 2026.
Appeals court rejects Biden's bid to block release of recordings of ghostwriter interviews. Business Frank Corder October 19, 2026.
Ingalls awarded $99 million contract modification for USS Lyndon B. Johnson sea trials. News Jeremy Pittari October 16, 2026.
Lawmakers hear reservations, ways to improve health outcomes in Mississippi's prison system.
According to It was, representatives with the Mississippi Department of Corrections were invited to attend the Joint Committee of Public Welfare and Corrections hearing held Thursday, but the agency did not show up to speak with the committee. News Frank Corder October 16, 2026.
Colom notes U.S. Senate race with Hyde-Smith is "tied" but polling, history tell another story in Mississippi.
Mississippi has seen this playbook before from a Democrat challenger to U.S. Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith. Like Scott Colom's campaign, media outlets ran with polling results in 2020 in her race with Mike Espy showing the Democrat was within 1% of the Republican incumbent. Espy then lost by 10%. News Frank Corder October 19, 2026. Mississippi incumbents hold sizeable cash advantage as General Election nears. News Frank Corder October 19, 2026.
Wicker publicly urges Trump to create a agreement with Zelenskyy: "Mr. President, Please Take This Win!" News Magnolia Tribune October 19, 2026. Magnolia Mornings: October 19, 2026. Business Cass Rutledge October 13, 2026. Startup plastics manufacturer Koinonia setting up operations in Drew. Business Cass Rutledge October 12, 2026. ALO investing over $176 million in Southaven for national distribution center. Business Cass Rutledge October 7, 2026.
Huntington Bank investing over $40 million to modernize Tupelo operations center, regional headquarters. Culture Robert St. John October 19, 2026. Dinner and a show. Culture Alistair Begg October 19, 2026. The city of man. Culture Susan Marquez October 16, 2026.
"Dummy Mummy" freed from her tomb once again at Two Mississippi Museums. Opinion Ellery Jones October 19, 2026. Forest products industry contributes heavily to Mississippi, U.S. Economy. Opinion Sid Salter October 14, 2026. Capital punishment logistical failures a self-fulfilling strategy of death penalty opponents? Opinion Roger Wicker October 9, 2026. Permit reform act is a much-needed course correction.
In short, supreme Court agrees to review a Reconstruction-era ban on distilling spirits in is the central thread here, and readers can expect follow-up reporting as the picture becomes clearer.



