Supreme Court Upholds Penalty on Ghee, Cooking Oil Makers for Price Fixing
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has upheld the Competition Commission of Pakistan's (CCP) finding that the Pakistan Vanaspati Manufacturers Association (PVMA) violated competition law by collectively fixing rates of ghee and cooking oil.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has upheld the Competition Commission of Pakistan's (CCP) finding that the Pakistan Vanaspati Manufacturers Association (PVMA) violated competition law by collectively fixing rates of ghee and cooking oil.
Article outline
- What happened
- The key numbers
- Reaction
- The bottom line
Key points
- Add ProPakistani to Preferred Sources and see more of our stories in Google Search and Top Stories.
- When the administration was seeking lower rates for ghee and cooking oil, the case relates to discussions held between the federal administration and PVMA during 2007-09.
- Add as a preferredSource on Google Follow on Google News Join WhatsApp.
- The Supreme Court agreed that competing businesses must independently determine their rates based on their own commercial decisions.
- The Supreme Court therefore upheld the CCP's finding of price-fixing and ordered PVMA to deposit Rs.
For context, a two-member Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail and Justice Salahuddin Panhwar upheld the findings of both the CCP and the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT).
Meanwhile, the court directed PVMA to deposit a penalty of Rs. 30 million. CCP Allows IGI Investments to Acquire Stake in Akzo Nobel Pakistan.
PVMA took part in the discussions and afterwards communicated the agreed costs to its member firms.
For context, the CCP discovered that the association had negotiated and fixed costs on behalf of its members with the administration, violating Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2010. It initially imposed a Rs. 50 million penalty, which was afterwards upheld by the CAT.
Notably, the Supreme Court agreed that competing businesses must independently determine their rates based on their own commercial decisions. A trade association cannot collectively set rates for its members.
Notably, the court additionally rejected the argument that lower agreed costs created the arrangement acceptable.
It held that the key violation was not whether the agreed rates were higher or lower, but that competing businesses had collectively determined costs instead of making independent pricing decisions. Finance Minister Seeks More Private Investment.
According to The court further, an arrangement cannot escape competition law simply as it is intended to serve the public interest.
Notably, the Supreme Court therefore upheld the CCP's finding of price-fixing and ordered PVMA to deposit Rs. 30 million. Stay Connected with ProPakistani.
Obtain the latest business news, market insights, and economic updates wherever you prefer. Follow on Google Discover.
In short, supreme Court Upholds Penalty on Ghee, Cooking Oil Makers for Price Fixing is the central thread here, and readers can expect follow-up reporting as the picture becomes clearer.




