UK could have averted US 'trap' in Iran war: Boris

Nifty24, 252.0020.16. Motilal Oswal Midcap Fund Direct-Growth.

Key points

• Boris Johnson Iran WarStrait of HormuzUK US RelationsEconomic Times World Leaders ForumBritain US IntelligenceIndia US UK CoordinationUS Military ObjectivesUK Trump's PentagonIran US ConflictIntelligence Agencies.
• By ET OnlineLast Updated: Aug 22, 2026, 11: 08: 00 AM IST.
• Someone should have interrogated the United States, if not President Trump, his planners, the Pentagon.
• UK could have averted US 'trap' in Iran war, notes Boris Johnson; calls for India-US-UK coordination over Hormuz.
• Boris Johnson has asserted that Britain had the capability to sidestep a potential US trap in Iran.

Nifty24, 252.0020.16. Motilal Oswal Midcap Fund Direct-Growth. The Economic Times daily newspaper is available online now.

Boris Johnson has asserted that Britain had the capability to sidestep a potential US trap in Iran. He insisted that UK intelligence should have flagged the dangers of escalating conflict and the likelihood of Hormuz's closure. Johnson believes that the UK, maintaining its close alliance with the US, ought to have critically assessed American war intends and anticipated potential Iranian reactions.

Former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has remarked Britain could have played a stronger role in preventing the United States from walking into what he described as an "obvious, obvious trap" in its war with Iran, arguing that British intelligence should have cautioned the administration concerning the risks of the conflict and the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Speaking at the Economic Times World Leaders Forum, Johnson remarked the UK should have questioned US President Donald Trump, his planners and the Pentagon concerning the objectives of the war before the conflict escalated.: Trump calls Strait of Hormuz 'American territory', warns Iran over nuclear arms.

"Someone should have interrogated the United States, if not President Trump, his planners, the Pentagon. What is the objective of this war?" Johnson remarked. As one of Washington's closest allies, should have sought clarity on the US strategy and its intends in the event of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz, he argued that Britain. Live Events.

"And we are your number one ally, right? We're your feeder circadians. We're we're your loyal hedge person, " Johnson remarked. "What do you want us to do to support you achieve your your objectives? And what are those objectives? And by the way, what are you going to do if they close the Straits of Hormuz?" Johnson remarked Britain's intelligence agencies had the expertise to identify the risks and potentially prevent the situation from reaching its current state. "I really think we could have averted an obvious, obvious trap, " he remarked. Johnson: UK should have cautioned administration.

Notably, the former British prime minister questioned why the UK's security services had not briefed the administration concerning the risks of the US military strategy. "But why, why, why, why weren't our security services briefing the government that the US is about to walk into a terrible trap?" he asked. Johnson remarked the UK had produced a mistake by failing to do more before the conflict escalated.: Iran vows 'devastating' response as US threatens toughest ever economic hit "I think the UK could have played a stronger role in trying to stop this mistake, " he noted, adding that Britain now needed to "back up" after going down what he repeatedly described as a "cul-de-sac". His comments come against the backdrop of continued uncertainty over the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial global energy route that has been at the centre of the US-Iran conflict. For context, the waterway normally handles a significant share of global oil and LNG shipments, making any prolonged disruption a major concern for energy markets and countries such as India. Johnson backs India-US-UK coordination.

Johnson additionally produced a direct pitch for closer coordination between India, the US and the UK, saying the three countries should work together to find a way out of the crisis. "I think India is going through a very good period under very strong and stable leadership, and that's a good thing, " he remarked. He described the US as the world's hegemonic power and remarked he would prefer Washington to retain that role over China. "But the world needs leadership too, and for better or worse, America is the hegemon, and I frankly much rather have America as the hegemon than anybody else, apart from the UK." Johnson remarked India should be part of efforts to resolve the crisis, including finding ways to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, reduce oil costs and restore shipping. "That's what we've got to do, and I think probably that goes for India too, " he remarked. He pressed the US, UK and India to consult each other and coordinate their aims. "But the way to do it is by sticking together, and that means the U.S., U.K., India consulting each other, concerting our plans, working out how to get the world out of this mess, get the price of oil down, get the ships moving, " Johnson remarked. He additionally called on alternative logistical arrangements, including pipelines and other routes that could reduce dependence on the Strait of Hormuz. "Look, we've got to have a logistical alternative for the Straits of Hormuz, " he remarked. Johnson questions Iran regime-change strategy.

Johnson remarked he backed efforts to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons and curb its backing for militant groups, but criticised the strategy employed to pursue regime change. "I think in principle it's a good idea to stop them getting a nuclear weapon, " he remarked. He additionally stated he backed efforts to stop Iran from supporting militant groups throughout the Middle East. Nevertheless, Johnson questioned whether military action from the air could achieve the goal of changing Iran's administration. "It was totally deranged to think that you could change the regime in Iran from the air, " he remarked. "Did we learn nothing from 2003?" Johnson remarked any political change in Iran ultimately had to come from within the country. "Change has got to come from within Iran, " he remarked, adding that the Iranian residents "need to be encouraged to change". Johnson notes Trump is consultative.

Asked whether Trump was probable to change course and whether he was receptive to advice from allies, Johnson described the US president as highly consultative. "Yeah. Look, I think he is. Yes, Donald Trump is a deeply consultative type of person, " Johnson remarked. He recalled instances when Trump had personally called him to seek his opinion. "I mean, honestly, I've been shocked. I've been lying comatose in hotels in Miami when he rang me up and asked my opinion on something, " he remarked. Johnson remarked he believed Prime Minister Narendra Modi was similarly aware of Trump's willingness to listen to residents he considers friends. "He loves to hear from his friends and to get advice, " Johnson remarked. Johnson nevertheless remarked he regretted that Britain had not done more to influence the US strategy. "I really, really regret it, " he remarked. Add Now!

Bigger or Better: BEL's biggest shareholder is additionally its biggest customer – and its rule-maker. Final part. Train station to rocket propellants, a Nagpur firm's INR21k-cr journey. Are patients paying the cost for India's PE-led healthcare boom? Notably, the Nifty doesn't predict India. It records it.

Power shift, a déjà vu: Air India could be new CEO's toughest flight yet.

For now, UK could have averted US ' trap' in Iran war: Boris remains the part of the story worth watching, and further updates are likely as more details are confirmed.