Bombay HC directs Maharashtra FDA to pay Rs 5 lakh compensation to Pune sweets shop

The Bombay High Court on Monday directed the Maharashtra FDA to pay Rs 5 lakh compensation to a Pune-based sweets shop for keeping its licence suspended despite a 98 per cent compliance report, noting that the regulator's intention was laudable but it had gone "overboard".The shop, Gurunanak Dairy and Sweets, had challenged the FDA's action…

CrimeNews Info Wire2 min read
Bombay HC directs Maharashtra FDA to pay Rs 5 lakh compensation to Pune sweets shop

Key points

  • A bench of Acting Chief Justice Ravindra Ghuge and Justice Gautam Ankhad said the Food and Drug Administration's order suspending…
  • The shop, Gurunanak Dairy and Sweets, had challenged the FDA's action in the high court and said it had lost…
  • On July 13, a re-inspection was carried out, and the shop was found to be 98 per cent compliant, but…
  • FDA Commissioner Tukaram Mundhe told PTI that he would examine the order before responding.

The Bombay High Court on Monday directed the Maharashtra FDA to pay Rs 5 lakh compensation to a Pune-based sweets shop for keeping its licence suspended despite a 98 per cent compliance report, noting that the regulator’s intention was laudable but it had gone “overboard”.

The shop, Gurunanak Dairy and Sweets, had challenged the FDA’s action in the high court and said it had lost Rs 8.74 lakh in revenue since its closure in June.

A bench of Acting Chief Justice Ravindra Ghuge and Justice Gautam Ankhad said the Food and Drug Administration’s order suspending licenses of eateries and hotels was a “strange policy and perverse”.

Meanwhile, FDA Commissioner Tukaram Mundhe told PTI that he would examine the order before responding.

What happened

While permitting the shop to reopen its business, ordered the department to pay the owners Rs 5 lakh compensation within a month, the bench.

“We have observed that your intention is laudable and some department has at least stood up. But you are going overboard. You should have immediately revoked the suspension of the license once you noticed 98 per cent compliance (in the re-inspection report),” the bench said.

According to The petition, a food safety officer from the FDA inspected the shop premises on June 12 following a complaint of food poisoning, and triggered concern over sanitation and staff hygiene. The same day, the department passed an order suspending the shop’s license.

The shop filed an appeal before the FDA Commissioner and also submitted a compliance report.

The details

On July 13, a re-inspection was carried out, and the shop was found to be 98 per cent compliant, but the license was not restored.

The shop owners then submitted a representation to the FDA seeking revocation of the suspension order, but no action was taken, following which they moved the High Court.

Mundhe said he would examine the order before responding.

“I have to see the order, then I will respond. FDA would act according to the law and prescribed processes. As per the processes, we follow it, and we implement it,” he added, we go as per the law.

Why it matters

(With Inputs From PTI)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *